Skip to main content

Posts

Regent Law School Ranked 21st in the Nation for Alums Working in Public Interest Law

According to the March ’08 issue of The National Jurist , Regent Law School ranks alongside UC-Berkeley, the University of Michigan, the University of Wisconsin and NYU law schools for the percentage of alums working in public interest law. Regent Law School was also recently ranked in the Top 20 by the National Law Journal for the number of half-to-full scholarships granted. The connection is clear: Regent Law School provides affordable excellence in legal education, enabling students to follow their calling anywhere. ------------------------------------------------------------- Excellent legal training and scholarship are not the only things that make Regent Law School unique. Click here to learn more. Want more information? Get real-time answers to your questions about Regent Law School now.

Law Students’ Published Work Impacting Legal World

While oral advocacy victories have been top news as of late, Regent Law School students are also busy engaging the legal community with their written work. With the addition of the newly formed Regent Journal of Law and Public Policy (RJLPP), Regent Law School now boasts three scholarly journals including the Regent Law Review (RLR) and the Regent Journal of International Law (RJIL). Through these journals students are publishing notes, pursuing top submissions, and researching and editing legal articles. And because journals like the RJIL are circulated internationally, student publications continue to have global reach and impact. Highlighted below are some of Regent Law School’s writers and their award-winning work: Leo Lestino (3L) Publication, 2007-2008 Issue of the Thomas Goode Jones Law Review, "Can Jiminy Cricket be Silenced? Congressional Federal Spending, Federalism, and the Federal Refusal Clause." Competition, 2007 Pacific Legal Foundation Program for Judicial Aw...

Regent Law School Ranked 15th in the Nation for Scholarships Granted

In an article titled “What Law School Rankings Don’t Say About Costly Choices”, The National Law Journal ranks Regent Law School 15th in the nation for law schools offering half-to-full scholarships. Boasting a 92% employment rate 9 months after graduation (Class of 2007), a strong regional and national reputation, and a commitment to training students with the legal skills necessary for success, Regent Law School continues to attract students who think outside the box – both in the way they evaluate rankings and the way they eventually practice law. The authors, professors from Indiana University School of Law and University of Illinois College of Law, argue that the link between going to a top tier law school and landing a corporate salary large enough to handle the debt incurred is a flimsy one at best. They write, “Slavishly following the U.S. News rankings will not significantly increase one's large-firm job prospects. And the excess debt that students incur is likely to under...

Regent Law Student Writes Winning Embryo Donation and Adoption Essay

Fullerton, Calif., April 7, 2008 – Regent Law student Jonathan Penn was awarded $1500 for his winning position paper responding to a delicate issue presented on the subject of embryo donation and adoption. The winning students in Nightlight Christian Adoptions’ 2008 national essay contest carefully tackled the issue of how to handle custody of a child born through embryo adoption after discovering that the egg donor never intended for any resulting embryos to be donated. The detailed problem and winning essays can be read at http://www.embryolaw.org/ . Jonathan Penn placed second and is joined in the winner’s circle by students from Stetson University College of Law and St. Mary's University School of Law.

Regent Law Softball Team Takes 2nd place at UVA National Tournament

The rainy weekend of April 4-6 brought two softball teams from Regent Law to Charlottesville, VA, to compete in the 25th Annual Virginia Law Softball Invitational. Over 100 other teams from law schools around the country came out for what has become a highly-anticipated event. Thirteen Regent students on the men’s team leveled three teams on Saturday to emerge the #1 seed. Ohio State, 18-3; George Washington University (Blue), 27-1; and Washington University, 26-1. On Sunday, they beat George Washington University (Gold) and University of South Carolina before losing the championship to UVA Gold. This is the second year that the men’s team has contended with reigning champs UVA Gold for first place. Last year, UVA dubbed the battle that ended 9-8, “UVA v. God.” There’s no doubt they felt the same pressure this year; like the rain, Regent’s force was non-stop and the UVA squad narrowly escaped in a 7-6 victory. For the first year, Regent also entered a co-ed team. Led by Captain Pete G...

Regent Alum represents 2008 Beijing Olympic Athletes

Kimberly Holland (Law ’02), president and CEO of Icon Management, a sports and entertainment agency, was featured in an article published by New American Media. Holland is one of the nation’s few female sports agents, and a number of her agency’s athletes will compete in the 2008 Olympics in Beijing. http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=e61ed22c52eced53f1a53c3e3ff7d9b8

Professor’s Legislative Recommendation Changes Outcome of Criminal Prosecution

In 2003, Professor James Duane published The Virginia Supreme Court Takes a Big Bite Out of the Privilege for Marital Communications, 29 The Virginia Bar Association News Journal 8 (March 2003). His article gained the attention of a delegate in Virginia’s General Assembly, who arranged for Professor Duane to be appointed to serve on a committee that drafted a new version of Virginia’s law on marital privileges. His proposal was adopted by the legislature in 2005, and in December of 2007, that amendment directly affected the outcome of Carpenter v. Commonwealth, 654 S.E.2d 345 (Va. Ct. App. 2007). In Carpenter, the defendant confessed to his wife that he had raped their teenage daughter. At his later trial, the wife wished to testify against him about that confession. Under the version of Virginia’s marital privilege in place at the time of his confession, his wife would not have been allowed to reveal what he told her, not even if she wished to do so. However, by the time of the trial...