Skip to main content

Professor’s Legislative Recommendation Changes Outcome of Criminal Prosecution

In 2003, Professor James Duane published The Virginia Supreme Court Takes a Big Bite Out of the Privilege for Marital Communications, 29 The Virginia Bar Association News Journal 8 (March 2003). His article gained the attention of a delegate in Virginia’s General Assembly, who arranged for Professor Duane to be appointed to serve on a committee that drafted a new version of Virginia’s law on marital privileges. His proposal was adopted by the legislature in 2005, and in December of 2007, that amendment directly affected the outcome of Carpenter v. Commonwealth, 654 S.E.2d 345 (Va. Ct. App. 2007).

In Carpenter, the defendant confessed to his wife that he had raped their teenage daughter. At his later trial, the wife wished to testify against him about that confession. Under the version of Virginia’s marital privilege in place at the time of his confession, his wife would not have been allowed to reveal what he told her, not even if she wished to do so. However, by the time of the trial and pursuant to Professor Duane’s recommendations, the law had been amended to make that privilege unavailable in any proceeding “in which either spouse is charged with a crime against the minor child of either spouse.” Virginia Code § 8.01-398. Virginia’s General Assembly agreed with Professor Duane that the law should not provide a sanctuary for criminals who commit crimes against their own spouses and children.

The Court of Appeals of Virginia held that this amendment applied retroactively to a confession made before the amendment was adopted, because the trial took place after the effective date of the change in the law. As a result, the appeals court concluded that the defendant’s objection to his wife’s testimony in Carpenter was properly overruled, and his conviction was affirmed.

“This result is clearly in accordance with one of my objectives in drafting the amended statute,” reports Duane. “Although I am a strong believer in the importance of the privilege for marital communications, I do not believe it should be employed to prevent a married woman from voluntarily testifying against a husband who confessed to her that he committed vile crimes against her children.”

Popular posts from this blog

Regent Law Named One of PreLaw Magazine's 20 Most Innovative Law Schools

Regent University School of Law was recently identified as one of PreLaw Magazine's 20 Most Innovative Law Schools, defined as "...schools that are on the cutting edge when it comes to preparing students for the future."


Pages 32-33 of the article reads,
Through Regent Law's Integrated Lawyer Training, students participate in a number of opportunities designed to enhance their legal education through hands-on training and ethical formation.  Students learn workplace skills, such as basic accounting principles and technological competence with e-discovery, e-filing and other cutting edge law office technology. Third year students also have the opportunity to participate in a for-credit apprenticeship, where they work and study under an attorney while taking online coursework.  Regent Law was also ranked in the top 15 of law schools for human rights law and given an "A" rating.

Click here to read PreLaw Magazine's Back to School 2017 issue > 

Click here …

Regent Law Trains Lawyers Called to Fight for Social Justice

As Regional Legal Coordinator with Freedom Firm in Maharashtra, India, Evan Henck ‘07 helps unravel the complex legal and social difficulties that come with prosecuting sex trafficking.
Evan’s virtual journal entry below depicts the sobering reality of the sex trade even as it celebrates the Freedom Firm’s recent progress. It originally appeared in the 2010 Spring/Summer edition of “Brief Remark”, Regent University School of Law’s new biannual publication.
From giving papers at a national human rights conferences and training human rights attorneys, to subsidizing summer internships within the nascent Center for Global Justice, the Regent Law community is committed to furthering the cause of justice at home and abroad.
If you feel called to the legal profession and to the fight for social justice, a Regent J.D. might be for you. Learn more here.

Jan. 16 2010
Maharashtra, India
In January an informant phoned Suresh Pawar, a human rights activist with the Freedom Firm in Maharashtra, India,…

Two Regent Law Alums Receive JAG Appointments at George Washington

Congratulations to Regent Law alums John Legg (’08) and Ari Craig (‘09), two of only three recipients of Judge Advocate General (JAG) appointments to the National Security and U.S. Foreign Relations Law LL.M. program at George Washington.


John is a JAG in the Air Force and his follow-on assignment is to the Department of Law at the Air Force Academy to teach cadets.

Ari,  a JAG in the Navy, will be assigned to an operational law billet in Washington, D.C.

Selection by the armed services for this LL.M. Program is based on the applicant’s military record as an officer. We are very proud of them both!