by Paul Allen, Associate Director of M.A. in Financial Planning & Law
Does a financial planning program really belong in a law school? I wondered about that when I first joined the Regent University team. Financial planning is primarily about finance and money. Those topics are typically taught in business school. Why, then, would Regent put the Financial Planning Master's Degree program in the School of Law? Turns out there are some good reasons for it!Let me state upfront that Regent University would not have a financial planning program that meets the CFP Board’s standards at Regent Law without assistance from the School of Business and Leadership (SBL). The faculty and administration at the SBL consistently exceed the CFP Board’s learning requirements. The program may be housed in the law school, but it is truly a team effort.
Here are five advantages of earning your master's degree and becoming a CFP® through the School of Law at Regent University:
- Providing financial advice is a regulated
activity. Investment
advisors are
regulated by the various states or the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC), depending on the size of the
firm. Dually registered advisors may also be regulated by FINRA or
the state insurance commissioner. The states, the SEC, FINRA,
insurance commissioners, and the CFP Board all have testing
requirements to ensure knowledge, understanding, and
compliance with the applicable regulations.
Teaching about regulations is a core competency
of the law school.
- Comprehensive financial planning integrates estate
planning. At the heart of
every estate plan lies a will, a durable power of attorney, a
healthcare directive, and medical power of attorney. Trusts and
foundations are also common. Even non-attorney financial
planners must be knowledgeable about these various legal instruments to advise clients
about the necessity to involve an estate planning attorney in the
financial planning process. Teaching estate planning
is another core competency of the law school.
- Comprehensive financial planning involves tax planning. While
there are numbers and math involved in tax planning, tax law is
created and revised by acts of Congress, Internal Revenue Service
regulations, and case law. The formation and taxation of various
business entities is also a key knowledge topic for both financial
planners and law practitioners. It is well within the law
school’s compass to teach tax law.
- A different perspective. Having
the program in the law school provides a different perspective on
financial planning than what is found in ‘typical’ financial
planning programs. Business generally lends itself to
distinct ‘black or white’ choices. Compared to the
law there are fewer shades of grey. The law tends to
be more nuanced, with the ‘right’ answer often being
situationally dependent. Financial planning is similar in this
regard. The right solution for one client may be unsuitable for another.
Exposure to a non-businesslike perspective on
financial planning provides a refreshing perspective to
many candidates.
- Lawyers have the Accelerated Path option to pursue the
CFP® designation. Certain
professionals, including lawyers, have the option to bypass the bulk
of the CFP Board’s education requirements. They can sit for the CFP® exam
after completing the Capstone Course in Financial Planning (MLAW
545). By having the financial planning program in the
law school, we make the Accelerated Path more readily
available to the greatest number of Regent graduates who
would qualify to pursue it.
One of the first questions I
asked myself when I considered becoming part of the Regent team
was ‘why is the financial planning program part of the
law school?’ Now I ask why more colleges and
universities have not thought about doing it this way. It is another
example of how Regent University is blazing a path for others to
follow.